<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CH. Rayo&#8217;s Number!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/04/15/ch-rayos-number/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/04/15/ch-rayos-number/</link>
	<description>The Math Factor Podcast Site</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: strauss</title>
		<link>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/04/15/ch-rayos-number/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>strauss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 18:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/04/15/ch-rayos-number/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>The Busy Beaver Function, mentioned in this segment, is really quite amazing; one particularly mind-blowing property is that it &lt;em&gt; grows faster than &lt;b&gt; any &lt;/b&gt; computable function!!!&lt;/em&gt;

(More correctly, no computable function bounds the busy beaver function; i.e. anything you can actually compute, in any way whatsover, will sooner or later be topped by the Busy Beaver!!) We're planning to come back to this paradoxical sounding statement in a later segment...


But that was just a way-station on the way to Rayo's number, which is vastly larger than anything you can easily name: essentially, he calls for the biggest number that takes a googol's worth of symbols to notate, in any well-defined way, and then tops that!

As we saw&lt;a href="http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/04/13/follow-up-grahams-number/" rel="nofollow"&gt; last week&lt;/a&gt;, Graham's number only takes, maybe, a hundred symbols to write out, so it is hard to get a handle on what Rayo's number might be!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Busy Beaver Function, mentioned in this segment, is really quite amazing; one particularly mind-blowing property is that it <em> grows faster than <b> any </b> computable function!!!</em></p>
<p>(More correctly, no computable function bounds the busy beaver function; i.e. anything you can actually compute, in any way whatsover, will sooner or later be topped by the Busy Beaver!!) We&#8217;re planning to come back to this paradoxical sounding statement in a later segment&#8230;</p>
<p>But that was just a way-station on the way to Rayo&#8217;s number, which is vastly larger than anything you can easily name: essentially, he calls for the biggest number that takes a googol&#8217;s worth of symbols to notate, in any well-defined way, and then tops that!</p>
<p>As we saw<a href="http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/04/13/follow-up-grahams-number/" rel="nofollow"> last week</a>, Graham&#8217;s number only takes, maybe, a hundred symbols to write out, so it is hard to get a handle on what Rayo&#8217;s number might be!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
