Comments on: CS. Perfect Sums http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/08/07/cs-perfect-sums/ The Math Factor Podcast Site Fri, 04 Jul 2008 02:52:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: foley http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/08/07/cs-perfect-sums/#comment-110 foley Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:21:42 +0000 http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/08/07/cs-perfect-sums/#comment-110 How about Coincident times. Any hand position on the clock may or may not have a coincident time or may be a coincident time. At any ambiguous moment the hand position also represents that moment and its coincident time. 12:00:00 and the other 10 aligned times do not have coincident times since the hands are aligned on each other. How about Coincident times.
Any hand position on the clock may or may not have a coincident time or may be a coincident time. At any ambiguous moment the hand position also represents that moment and its coincident time.
12:00:00 and the other 10 aligned times do not have coincident times since the hands are aligned on each other.

]]> By: nklein http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/08/07/cs-perfect-sums/#comment-109 nklein Thu, 09 Aug 2007 21:28:15 +0000 http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/08/07/cs-perfect-sums/#comment-109 I like ambichronic... but I'm also partial to handbivalent. I like ambichronic… but I’m also partial to handbivalent.

]]> By: georgelu61 http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/08/07/cs-perfect-sums/#comment-108 georgelu61 Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:15:43 +0000 http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/08/07/cs-perfect-sums/#comment-108 I believe 36 is the lowest possible solution 4, 9, 2, 3, 18 works : ) btw i thought of two decent names for the ambiguous times- ambichronic, from an etymological standpoint a good choice but isochronic has a nice ring to it :) I believe 36 is the lowest possible solution

4, 9, 2, 3, 18 works : )

btw

i thought of two decent names for the ambiguous times-

ambichronic, from an etymological standpoint a good choice

but isochronic has a nice ring to it :)

]]>