<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DT. Speaking of Self-reference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2008/04/14/dt-speaking-of-self-reference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2008/04/14/dt-speaking-of-self-reference/</link>
	<description>The Math Factor Podcast Site</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DougM</title>
		<link>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2008/04/14/dt-speaking-of-self-reference/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>DougM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2008/04/14/dt-speaking-of-self-reference/#comment-294</guid>
		<description>While it is not possible to have two Docks in the universe, we know that there can occur more than one Doctor in an office. So, is the existence of a Pair-of-Docs being inconsistent with the exclusion of a Pair-of-Docks itself a paradox?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it is not possible to have two Docks in the universe, we know that there can occur more than one Doctor in an office. So, is the existence of a Pair-of-Docs being inconsistent with the exclusion of a Pair-of-Docks itself a paradox?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
