<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yoak: A Rather Odd Car Trip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2009/04/a-rather-odd-car-trip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2009/04/a-rather-odd-car-trip/</link>
	<description>The Math Factor Podcast Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:30:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jyoak</title>
		<link>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2009/04/a-rather-odd-car-trip/comment-page-1/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>jyoak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 21:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathfactor.uark.edu/?p=558#comment-506</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve posted some more of my own thoughts as a followup in a later post here: http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2009/05/04/yoak-followup-to-a-rather-odd-car-trip/ .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve posted some more of my own thoughts as a followup in a later post here: <a href="http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2009/05/04/yoak-followup-to-a-rather-odd-car-trip/" rel="nofollow">http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2009/05/04/yoak-followup-to-a-rather-odd-car-trip/</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjrogers</title>
		<link>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2009/04/a-rather-odd-car-trip/comment-page-1/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>pjrogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathfactor.uark.edu/?p=558#comment-500</guid>
		<description>[spoiler]I also got distance=273 miles


I converted the miles per hour into minutes per hour and set up three equations:


x+y+z=d
9x+8y+7z=2016
7x+8y+9z=2352


doing some linear algebra showed that the matrix would simplify down to the equation 9d-2016=2352-7d. Solving for d gives 273.[/spoiler]


Fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="javascript:void(null);" onclick="s_toggleDisplay(document.getElementById('SID683760962'), this, 'Show Spoiler &#9660;', 'Hide Spoiler &#9650;');">Show Spoiler &#9660;</a></p>
<div id='SID683760962' style='display:none;'>
I also got distance=273 miles</p>
<p>I converted the miles per hour into minutes per hour and set up three equations:</p>
<p>x+y+z=d<br />
9x+8y+7z=2016<br />
7x+8y+9z=2352</p>
<p>doing some linear algebra showed that the matrix would simplify down to the equation 9d-2016=2352-7d. Solving for d gives 273.
</p></div>
<p>Fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nklein</title>
		<link>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2009/04/a-rather-odd-car-trip/comment-page-1/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>nklein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathfactor.uark.edu/?p=558#comment-498</guid>
		<description>That was a fun problem.  I spent most of it grudgingly going through the motions expecting to find a range of answers.  Alas, they collapsed nicely in the end.  Bonus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a fun problem.  I spent most of it grudgingly going through the motions expecting to find a range of answers.  Alas, they collapsed nicely in the end.  Bonus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jyoak</title>
		<link>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2009/04/a-rather-odd-car-trip/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>jyoak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathfactor.uark.edu/?p=558#comment-497</guid>
		<description>czarandy, about your solution...

[spoiler]

101+170+2 is also 273, not 271.  You are correct that the amount uphill, downhill and level aren&#039;t fixed, but the 273 total length is fixed.  That&#039;s what made this problem interesting to me.  You&#039;re drawn to try to compute two equations in three unknowns which you can&#039;t do.  You also have to be quite particular about what speed you select for the relative conditions or you may not have a unique solution.  I&#039;ll be posting all about this soon in another comment, but if you want to take this further, take a crack at describing what speeds will and will not have a unique answer.

[/spoiler]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>czarandy, about your solution&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="javascript:void(null);" onclick="s_toggleDisplay(document.getElementById('SID1623448371'), this, 'Show Spoiler &#9660;', 'Hide Spoiler &#9650;');">Show Spoiler &#9660;</a></p>
<div id='SID1623448371' style='display:none;'>
<p>101+170+2 is also 273, not 271.  You are correct that the amount uphill, downhill and level aren&#8217;t fixed, but the 273 total length is fixed.  That&#8217;s what made this problem interesting to me.  You&#8217;re drawn to try to compute two equations in three unknowns which you can&#8217;t do.  You also have to be quite particular about what speed you select for the relative conditions or you may not have a unique solution.  I&#8217;ll be posting all about this soon in another comment, but if you want to take this further, take a crack at describing what speeds will and will not have a unique answer.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: czarandy</title>
		<link>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2009/04/a-rather-odd-car-trip/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>czarandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathfactor.uark.edu/?p=558#comment-495</guid>
		<description>[spoiler]
It seems there is not a unique solution?

e.g., one choice is that they are 273 miles apart. Of this 105 is level ground, and 168 is downhill on the way there (uphill on the way back).
So on the way there it takes 105/63 + 168/72 = 4 hours
On the way back it takes 105/63 + 168/56 = 4 hours 40 min

But they could also be 271 miles apart: 101 miles level, 170 downhill on the way there, and 2 miles uphill on the way there. 

etc.

[/spoiler]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="javascript:void(null);" onclick="s_toggleDisplay(document.getElementById('SID631918180'), this, 'Show Spoiler &#9660;', 'Hide Spoiler &#9650;');">Show Spoiler &#9660;</a></p>
<div id='SID631918180' style='display:none;'>
<p>It seems there is not a unique solution?</p>
<p>e.g., one choice is that they are 273 miles apart. Of this 105 is level ground, and 168 is downhill on the way there (uphill on the way back).<br />
So on the way there it takes 105/63 + 168/72 = 4 hours<br />
On the way back it takes 105/63 + 168/56 = 4 hours 40 min</p>
<p>But they could also be 271 miles apart: 101 miles level, 170 downhill on the way there, and 2 miles uphill on the way there. </p>
<p>etc.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
