<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>The Math Factor Podcast &#187; errata</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mathfactor.uark.edu/category/the-mathfactor-podcast/corrections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mathfactor.uark.edu</link>
	<description>The Math Factor Podcast Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:52:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" -->
		<copyright>&#xA9; </copyright>
		<managingEditor>strauss@uark.edu ()</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>strauss@uark.edu()</webMaster>
		<category></category>
		<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>The Math Factor Podcast Site</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author></itunes:author>
		<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name></itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>strauss@uark.edu</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="http://mathfactor.uark.edu/mathfactor/podcastImage.jpg" />
		
		<item>
		<title>CS. Perfect Sums</title>
		<link>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/08/cs-perfect-sums/</link>
		<comments>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/08/cs-perfect-sums/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 02:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>strauss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Mathcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[answers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[errata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math puzzles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numbers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/08/07/cs-perfect-sums/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, let&#8217;s answer last week&#8217;s puzzle on clocks! 
As it turns out, there are 143 times in each twelve hour period for which you can switch the hands of a clock and still have a legitimate time! It&#8217;s easy to find these by plotting the positions of the hands throughout the day:


The darker lines show [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, let&#8217;s answer <a href="http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/07/27/cr-clock-confusion/">last week&#8217;s puzzle on clocks!</a> </p>
<p>As it turns out, there are 143 times in each twelve hour period for which you can switch the hands of a clock and still have a legitimate time! It&#8217;s easy to find these by plotting the positions of the hands throughout the day:</p>
<p><span id="more-187"></span></p>
<p align= center><img src='http://mathfactor.uark.edu/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/ambiguousclock3.jpg' alt='ambiguousclock3.jpg' width = 350/></p>
<p>The darker lines show the positions of the hands if the vertical scale is for the minute hand and the horizontal scale is for the hour hand. The lighter lines reverse this. Where the lines meet, the position could make sense with either hand in either position.</p>
<p>If you count these intersections, you&#8217;ll see there are 143 times when the hands could be switched. The times on the green diagonal are when the two hands coincide&#8211; there are 11 of these, and the time is not ambigious since the time can be read in only one way. So there are 132 ambiguous moments. Hey&#8211; as Kyle asks, what is a better name for those special times of the day?</p>
<p>Here are some more of these:</p>
<p align= center>
<img src='http://mathfactor.uark.edu/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/more_clocks.jpg' alt='more_clocks.jpg' width=350/></p>
<p>.</p>
<p><a href='http://mathfactor.uark.edu/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/ambiguousclocks.jpg' title='ambiguousclocks.jpg'>And here are all 132!</a></p>
<p>Ok, on to the next puzzle!</p>
<hr />
<p>A set of numbers is <em>perfectly summing</em> if each of the numbers in it divides into the total. Can you always throw in some more numbers to a set to make it perfectly summing?</p>
<p>For example, {3,5} is not perfectly summing, but we can increase it to {3, 5, 10, 12, 30}; this is perfectly summing. Kyle asked about {4,9}&#8211; there is one solution with a total of 864; but uhm, this might not be optimal.</p>
<p>The real question is <strong>what is the general method?</strong> Try it out on {7,9,11}!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/08/cs-perfect-sums/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://mathfactor.uark.edu/podpress_trac/feed/187/0/71%20Perfect%20Sums.mp3" length="6986476" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>7:13</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>First, let's answer last week's puzzle on clocks! 

As it turns out, there are 143 times in each twelve hour period for which you can ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>First, let's answer last week's puzzle on clocks! 

As it turns out, there are 143 times in each twelve hour period for which you can switch the hands of a clock and still have a legitimate time! It's easy to find these by plotting the positions of the hands throughout the day:




The darker lines show the positions of the hands if the vertical scale is for the minute hand and the horizontal scale is for the hour hand. The lighter lines reverse this. Where the lines meet, the position could make sense with either hand in either position.

If you count these intersections, you'll see there are 143 times when the hands could be switched. The times on the green diagonal are when the two hands coincide-- there are 11 of these, and the time is not ambigious since the time can be read in only one way. So there are 132 ambiguous moments. Hey-- as Kyle asks, what is a better name for those special times of the day?

Here are some more of these:

.

And here are all 132!

Ok, on to the next puzzle!




A set of numbers is perfectly summing if each of the numbers in it divides into the total. Can you always throw in some more numbers to a set to make it perfectly summing?

For example, {3,5} is not perfectly summing, but we can increase it to {3, 5, 10, 12, 30}; this is perfectly summing. Kyle asked about {4,9}-- there is one solution with a total of 864; but uhm, this might not be optimal.

The real question is what is the general method? Try it out on {7,9,11}!

</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>The,Mathcast,,answers,,errata,,math,puzzles,,numbers</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>strauss@uark.edu</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CM. Crossing the Bridge</title>
		<link>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/05/cm-crossing-the-bridge/</link>
		<comments>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/05/cm-crossing-the-bridge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 03:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>strauss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Mathcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[answers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[errata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math puzzles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numbers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/05/21/cm-crossing-the-bridge/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Save Indiana, his girlfriend, his father and his father&#8217;s sidekick from certain doom! They must cross a bridge across a gorge in less than one hour!

This wonderful puzzle is from The Art and Craft of Problem Solving, by Paul Zeitz. Unfortunately,  we don&#8217;t know the answer!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Save Indiana, his girlfriend, his father and his father&#8217;s sidekick from certain doom! They must cross a bridge across a gorge in less than one hour!<br />
<span id="more-171"></span></p>
<p>This wonderful puzzle is from <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Art-Craft-Problem-Solving/dp/0471135712/ref=sr_1_1/105-4432144-9145214?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1179803399&#038;sr=8-1">The Art and Craft of Problem Solving</a>, by Paul Zeitz. Unfortunately, <em> we don&#8217;t know the answer!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/05/cm-crossing-the-bridge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://mathfactor.uark.edu/podpress_trac/feed/171/0/65%20Crossing%20the%20Bridge.mp3" length="10938892" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>11:22</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Save Indiana, his girlfriend, his father and his father's sidekick from certain doom! They must cross a bridge across a gorge in less than one ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Save Indiana, his girlfriend, his father and his father's sidekick from certain doom! They must cross a bridge across a gorge in less than one hour!


This wonderful puzzle is from The Art and Craft of Problem Solving, by Paul Zeitz. Unfortunately,  we don't know the answer!</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>The,Mathcast,,answers,,errata,,math,puzzles,,numbers</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>strauss@uark.edu</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CG. Graham&#8217;s Number</title>
		<link>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/04/cg-grahams-number/</link>
		<comments>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/04/cg-grahams-number/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>strauss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Mathcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[errata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numbers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/04/09/cg-grahams-number/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Graham&#8217;s number is truly, absolutely staggering&#8230;

 erratum:  Graham&#8217;s number is an upper bound for a problem in Ramsey theory. We erroneously stated that the problem was eventually solved, and the actual answer was six. No, six was proven to be a lower bound. 
From the Wikipedia article: 
Although the solution to this problem is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham's_number">Graham&#8217;s number</a> is truly, absolutely staggering&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-143"></span></p>
<p> <b>erratum:</b> <em> Graham&#8217;s number is an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham%27s_number">upper bound for a problem in Ramsey theory</a>. We erroneously stated that the problem was eventually solved, and the actual answer was six. No, six was proven to be a lower bound. </p>
<p>From the Wikipedia article: </p>
<blockquote><p>Although the solution to this problem is not yet known, Graham&#8217;s number is the smallest known upper bound. This bound was found by Graham and B. L. Rothschild (see (GR), corollary 12). They also provided the lower bound 6, adding the qualified understatement: &#8220;Clearly, there is some room for improvement here.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/04/cg-grahams-number/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://mathfactor.uark.edu/podpress_trac/feed/143/0/59%20Grahams%20Number.mp3" length="10999805" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>11:26</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Graham's number is truly, absolutely staggering...



 erratum:  Graham's number is an upper bound for a problem in Ramsey theory. We erroneously stated that the ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Graham's number is truly, absolutely staggering...



 erratum:  Graham's number is an upper bound for a problem in Ramsey theory. We erroneously stated that the problem was eventually solved, and the actual answer was six. No, six was proven to be a lower bound. 

From the Wikipedia article: 
Although the solution to this problem is not yet known, Graham's number is the smallest known upper bound. This bound was found by Graham and B. L. Rothschild (see (GR), corollary 12). They also provided the lower bound 6, adding the qualified understatement: "Clearly, there is some room for improvement here."


</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>The,Mathcast,,errata,,logic,,numbers</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>strauss@uark.edu</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CE. Big Numbers</title>
		<link>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/03/ce-big-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/03/ce-big-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 01:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>strauss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Mathcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[errata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math puzzles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numbers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/03/24/ce-big-numbers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re well on our way towards describing the two largest numbers that have ever been used!  Unfortunately, there are at least three errors in this segment of the Math Factor&#8211;can you spot them all?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re well on our way towards describing the two largest numbers that have ever been used!  Unfortunately, there are at least three errors in this segment of the Math Factor&#8211;can you spot them all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2007/03/ce-big-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://mathfactor.uark.edu/podpress_trac/feed/136/0/57%20BigNumbers.mp3" length="7133628" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>7:24</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>We're well on our way towards describing the two largest numbers that have ever been used!  Unfortunately, there are at least three errors in ...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>We're well on our way towards describing the two largest numbers that have ever been used!  Unfortunately, there are at least three errors in this segment of the Math Factor--can you spot them all?</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>The,Mathcast,,errata,,math,puzzles,,numbers</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>strauss@uark.edu</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>AN. More Sucker Bets</title>
		<link>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2006/04/more-sucker-bets/</link>
		<comments>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2006/04/more-sucker-bets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>strauss</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Mathcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[errata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math puzzles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theserver.uark.edu/~strauss/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there always a better choice?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there always a better choice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mathfactor.uark.edu/2006/04/more-sucker-bets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://mathfactor.uark.edu/podpress_trac/feed/38/0/14%20More%20Sucker%20Bets.mp3" length="7192868" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<itunes:duration>5:58</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Is there always a better choice? </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Is there always a better choice?</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>The,Mathcast,,errata,,math,puzzles</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>strauss@uark.edu</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
