DV. Dealing with Chaos
We explore Barry Cipra’s Tag Deal a bit more…
Archive for logic
DT. Speaking of Self-reference
We catch up with Raymond Smullyan, author of many fantastic books on logic, puzzles and paradoxes at this year’s Gathering for Gardner!
DQ. We Are Not Liars
We discuss, among other things, whether all mathematicians are liars.
Send us your favorite paradoxes of this kind and we’ll report back on April 15.
DP. Would Chuck Wood
We consider that perennial spring conundrum: Would a woodchuck chuck her own wood if she would chuck wood for exactly those woodchucks who would not chuck their own wood?
CW. The Surreal Numbers
What follows after 0, 1, 2, … , once you’ve managed to list every counting number?
Around 1875, Georg Cantor created — or discovered if you like — the transfinite ordinals : the list continues 0, 1, 2, …, then ω , ω + 1, ω + 2, etc, for quite a long long way. John H. Conway tells us about his Surreal Numbers , which add in such gems as
1 / √ ω
Check out Knuth’s Surreal Numbers, Conway & Guy’s Book of Numbers , or for more advanced users, Conway’s On Numbers and Games.
CV. Dividing the Loot
As B Boom wrote, the first pirate can make a proposal that gives him all but 49 (about, depending on the rules) pieces of
the gold. Read the rest of this entry »
Follow-up: The Stork and The Frog
Amusingly, this problem has exactly the same solution as the proof that there are as many rational numbers as there are counting numbers. And the proof generalizes: one stork can catch three frogs, or ten or fifty.
Here are some bonus problems:
- The stork can catch the frog even if it can start at any rational number and hop any fixed rational distance each step.
- However, if the frog can start at any real number or hop any real distance, the stork has no strategy that guarantees a catch. This is, in effect, the same as proving that the real numbers are not countable.
CH. Rayo’s Number!
A contestant for our Million-Dollar-Give-Away sent in Rayo’s Number, hitherto the largest number ever used for any real purpose: to wit, winning the
Check out the article by Scot Aaronson that inspired them to duke it out! And this thread on the math forum is quite interesting as well.
CG. Graham’s Number
Graham’s number is truly, absolutely staggering…
BA. The Ring is Exchanged
Peter Winkler answers his puzzle set in the Land of Kleptomaniacs, and we chat about Martin Gardner. We'll pose another puzzle next week!
The Math Factor in iTunes
RSS feed
Comments RSS
mathbun.com