May 6, 2007
·
answers, guests, infinity, math puzzles, The Mathcast, Topology and geometry
Niclas Hedell, a listener, poses a problem from his days in the Swedish military: given two trees in the forest, and a rope twice as long as the distance between the trees, how do you find a third tree so that all three make a right triangle.
And we explain how the Stork can catch the Frog.
Permalink
May 6, 2007
·
answers, Follow Up, infinity, logic, paradoxes, The Mathcast
Amusingly, this problem has exactly the same solution as the proof that there are as many rational numbers as there are counting numbers. And the proof generalizes: one stork can catch three frogs, or ten or fifty.
Here are some bonus problems:
- The stork can catch the frog even if it can start at any rational number and hop any fixed rational distance each step.
- However, if the frog can start at any real number or hop any real distance, the stork has no strategy that guarantees a catch. This is, in effect, the same as proving that the real numbers are not countable.
Permalink
April 29, 2007
·
answers, guests, math puzzles, The Mathcast
Lord Butler, Knight of the Garter, has never heard of the rule on last week’s show. But he notes he does move down the table each year…
When we posed this problem, we thought things would turn out a little differently, as we discuss here.
Permalink
April 23, 2007
·
math puzzles, The Mathcast
The twenty-five members of the Royal Order of the Garter, founded in 1348, by King Edward III, dine once each year at Windsor Castle, about a round table. From time immemorial, there has been a rule that no two members may be seated next to one another more than once each decade. But can they do better?
Permalink
April 15, 2007
·
answers, Favorites, guests, infinity, logic, Mathfactor Events, numbers, paradoxes, The Mathcast
A contestant for our Million-Dollar-Give-Away sent in Rayo’s Number, hitherto the largest number ever used for any real purpose: to wit, winning the
LARGE NUMBER CHAMPIONSHIP
Check out the article by Scot Aaronson that inspired them to duke it out! And this thread on the math forum is quite interesting as well.
Permalink
April 13, 2007
·
answers, Follow Up, numbers, The Mathcast
Graham’s number, as huge as it is, can be “described” or “named” in a very few symbols. Several people sent us programs that (in principle!) calculate Graham’s number— you can think of any of these programs as notation for Graham’s number.
Read the rest of this entry »
Permalink
April 2, 2007
·
answers, numbers, Q&A
We never did resolve the question of which grows faster:
In this corner we have
Sequence 1 n^^n
1, 2^2, 3^3^3, 4^4^4^4, and so on.
And over here we have Sequence 2, defined recursively by
The first entry is 1
the next entry is 2, followed by one (the previous entry) factorial sign; 2!=2
the next entry is 3, followed by two (the previous entry) factorial signs; 3!! = 6! = 720
4, followed by 720 factorial signs, which is a truly staggering number.
5 followed by whatever-the-previous-entry was number of factorial signs, etc.
In short, we can define the second sequence as s(1) = 1; s(n) = n, followed by s(n-1) factorial signs.
Which sequence grows faster than the other??
We have many conflicting answers, and no decisive resolution; here was one idea .
Permalink
March 24, 2007
·
errata, math puzzles, numbers, The Mathcast
We’re well on our way towards describing the two largest numbers that have ever been used! Unfortunately, there are at least three errors in this segment of the Math Factor–can you spot them all?
Permalink
March 19, 2007
·
Favorites, game theory, math puzzles, Mathfactor Events, numbers, The Mathcast
We discuss the results of the fabulous Math Factor Million Dollar Giveaway. and confess this was an excuse to bring up Game Theory and how to talk about really big numbers.
Permalink
March 15, 2007
·
answers, The Mathcast
The solution to the cake cutting puzzle; the end of the Million Dollar Give-Away.
Permalink